Upload screenshots of your app and receive an AI-powered audit across 6 critical UX dimensions. Scored, prioritized, actionable.
Report
produit.co
Findings
3 major · 1 minor
Dimension Scores
Upload, analyze, fix.
Drag and drop screenshots of your app, paste a URL, or connect your Figma file.
AI reviews every screen you give it and scores 6 UX dimensions.
Receive scored findings with severity ratings, fix recommendations, and a PDF download.
Every audit scores your product across these six areas
How easily users find what they need
Layout clarity and information flow
Obstacles blocking user goals
WCAG compliance and inclusivity
How well the UI drives actions
How the page holds up at a 390px viewport
Paste a URL and we load the page twice: once in a 1440px desktop window and once at 390px, the width of a typical phone. Some things are measured from the rendered page itself. The rest are judged from the two screenshots against established usability heuristics.
Navigation: how easily a visitor finds the main paths. Visual Hierarchy: whether the layout leads the eye to what matters first. Friction Points: steps that slow people down or make them hesitate. Conversion Design: whether the next action is obvious and worth taking. Accessibility and Mobile UX draw on both the measurements and the screenshots.
Every audit gives an overall score out of 100 and a score for each of the six dimensions. Your free audit each month adds your most severe finding. A Starter audit, $49 paid once, adds every finding ranked by impact with a fix for each, the quick wins and a three-sprint roadmap.
See how your product performs on navigation, visual hierarchy, friction points, accessibility, conversion design and mobile UX.
Low-effort, high-impact fixes you can ship in the current sprint.
A prioritised backlog split across three sprints, ranked by impact and effort.
Your page is captured twice — once on desktop and once at a 390px viewport — and Mobile UX is scored as its own dimension, so mobile problems never hide inside a desktop average.
Contrast ratios and tap-target sizes come from the DOM, not from looking at a screenshot. A finding that judges text size has to carry the measured value or it is dropped.
A paid audit covers up to three pages of the same site. Each is scored on its own, and a third pass looks only at what is true between them.
Pages two and three go through the same six-dimension analysis as the first, each with its own score, its own findings and its own evidence. There is no site-wide average, deliberately: an average of three pages describes none of them, so every number stays attached to the page it came from.
The comparison pass reports relationships rather than repeats. What differs between your pages, which page is the outlier in a dimension, what holds consistently across all of them, and what degrades along a path, the way form fields can climb from one step to the next. A claim that names only one page is discarded before you see it.
Every page has to belong to the same site: a conclusion about "the site" drawn across two unrelated domains is not so much wrong as meaningless. Multi-page needs URLs, so a screenshot upload is a one-page audit. And if a page fails to capture, you lose that page’s section and the report says so, never the whole audit.
Every page is scored on its own, then a third pass looks only at what is true between them. A single-page audit cannot produce this finding at any price, because the claim is about which page differs from the others.
Quoted verbatim from a three-page audit of roarsinc.com. Read the full report
the same element is not the same across pages
one page behaves unlike the rest
something holds everywhere
a quality falls off along a path the customer walks
A second audit of the same page lines up against the first. Two runs, side by side.
Both scores sit on one row, ordered by how far each dimension moved rather than by name. A dimension only one of the two runs could score reads "Not assessed" and stays out of the arithmetic, so a missing reading is never counted as a drop.
Findings split three ways: resolved, new, and still open. Each new issue carries the same recommended fix the full report gives it, so the comparison tells you what to do and not only what changed.
We order the two by date, so the earlier run is always the baseline, whichever way round you pick them. Comparing them costs nothing on its own: it comes with any two finished audits of the same page. What you actually need is the second audit. Your free audit covers the first, and every audit after that is $49.
Our unique methodology combines three analytical lenses for comprehensive UX analysis
Start free. Upgrade when you need more.
One audit every month
Pay per audit, no subscription
MOST TEAMSWhite label, by arrangement
A manual expert review costs $3,000-$15,000 and takes days. This runs in under five minutes, on the scope set out below.
A manual review still reads your product in context and talks to your team, which this does not. Run this before every release; commission one before a redesign.
One free audit every month. No credit card required.