AI UX Auditor

Instant UX audit —
Paste your URL, get insights

Upload screenshots of your app and receive an AI-powered audit across 6 critical UX dimensions. Scored, prioritized, actionable.

Report

Produit

produit.co

Findings

4

3 major · 1 minor

Dimension Scores

Nav70Navigation: 70 out of 100
Visual72Visual Hierarchy: 72 out of 100
Friction65Friction Points: 65 out of 100
A11y45Accessibility: 45 out of 100
Conv.55Conversion Design: 55 out of 100
Mobile52Mobile UX: 52 out of 100

Three steps to a professional UX audit

Upload, analyze, fix.

Upload screenshots

Drag and drop screenshots of your app, paste a URL, or connect your Figma file.

AI analyzes

AI reviews every screen you give it and scores 6 UX dimensions.

Get your report

Receive scored findings with severity ratings, fix recommendations, and a PDF download.

The Score

6 UX dimensions

Every audit scores your product across these six areas

Navigation

How easily users find what they need

Visual Hierarchy

Layout clarity and information flow

Friction Points

Obstacles blocking user goals

Accessibility

WCAG compliance and inclusivity

Conversion Design

How well the UI drives actions

Mobile UX

How the page holds up at a 390px viewport

Not just a score. A diagnosis.

Six Dimension Scores

See how your product performs on navigation, visual hierarchy, friction points, accessibility, conversion design and mobile UX.

Quick Wins

Low-effort, high-impact fixes you can ship in the current sprint.

Sprint Roadmap

A prioritised backlog split across three sprints, ranked by impact and effort.

Measured, not estimated

Desktop & Mobile Capture

Your page is captured twice — once on desktop and once at a 390px viewport — and Mobile UX is scored as its own dimension, so mobile problems never hide inside a desktop average.

Evidence-Checked Findings

Contrast ratios and tap-target sizes come from the DOM, not from looking at a screenshot. A finding that judges text size has to carry the measured value or it is dropped.

Three pages, and what runs between them

A paid audit covers up to three pages of the same site. Each is scored on its own, and a third pass looks only at what is true between them.

Every page scored on its own

Pages two and three go through the same six-dimension analysis as the first, each with its own score, its own findings and its own evidence. There is no site-wide average, deliberately: an average of three pages describes none of them, so every number stays attached to the page it came from.

Findings that only exist across pages

The comparison pass reports relationships rather than repeats. What differs between your pages, which page is the outlier in a dimension, what holds consistently across all of them, and what degrades along a path, the way form fields can climb from one step to the next. A claim that names only one page is discarded before you see it.

What it will not do

Every page has to belong to the same site: a conclusion about "the site" drawn across two unrelated domains is not so much wrong as meaningless. Multi-page needs URLs, so a screenshot upload is a one-page audit. And if a page fails to capture, you lose that page’s section and the report says so, never the whole audit.

Audit the same page again, and compare the two

A second audit of the same page lines up against the first. Two runs, side by side.

Every dimension, side by side

Both scores sit on one row, ordered by how far each dimension moved rather than by name. A dimension only one of the two runs could score reads "Not assessed" and stays out of the arithmetic, so a missing reading is never counted as a drop.

What you fixed, and what is new

Findings split three ways: resolved, new, and still open. Each new issue carries the same recommended fix the full report gives it, so the comparison tells you what to do and not only what changed.

We order the two by date, so the earlier run is always the baseline, whichever way round you pick them. Comparing them costs nothing on its own: it comes with any two finished audits of the same page. What you actually need is the second audit. Your free audit covers the first, and every audit after that is $49.

Powered by 3 AI models

Our unique methodology combines three analytical lenses for comprehensive UX analysis

Heuristic Engine

  • Visibility of system status
  • User control and freedom
  • Consistency and standards
  • Error prevention & recovery

Behavioral Lens

  • F-pattern & Z-pattern scanning
  • Cognitive load optimization
  • Click target sizing (Fitts's law)
  • Visual hierarchy flow

Conversion Optimizer

  • CTA effectiveness
  • Trust signals & social proof
  • Friction reduction
  • Value proposition clarity

Simple, transparent pricing

Start free. Upgrade when you need more.

Free

Free

$0
  • 1 page
  • Overall score and all 6 dimension scores
  • One finding in full, with its evidence, impact and fix
  • 1 audit per month

Starter

Per audit

$49/audit
  • Up to 3 pages of the same site
  • Cross-page analysis
  • Every finding with evidence and fix
  • Annotated screenshots
  • PDF export and sprint roadmap
  • Severity prioritisation

ROI, measured clearly

A manual expert review costs $3,000-$15,000 and takes days. This runs in under five minutes, on the scope set out below.

Manual expert review

Cost
$3,000-$15,000
Turnaround
Days, booked around a specialist’s calendar
Scope
Set per engagement
Running it again
A new engagement
Consistency
Depends who runs it

UXAuditPro

Cost
$49 per audit. Your first audit is free.
Turnaround
Under 5 minutes, whenever you run it
Scope
Six dimensions on a website URL. Five on a Figma link or an upload, unless you mark it a mobile app.
Running it again
Re-run after any release
Consistency
The same scoring rules on every audit

A manual review still reads your product in context and talks to your team, which this does not. Run this before every release; commission one before a redesign.

Questions & answers

Ready to audit your app?

Get your first UX audit completely free. No credit card required.